MANILA, Philippines – Sen. Panfilo Lacson on Saturday warned that senators, along with members of the House of Representatives, may be complicit in the ongoing controversy involving anomalous and ghost flood control projects, reiterating his call for complete transparency in the national budgeting process.
Lacson said on radio that lawmakers from both chambers routinely propose budget amendments or "insertions"—a practice that, while technically legal, can be exploited to channel funds into questionable infrastructure projects.
Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal, This news data comes from:http://052298.com
“I’m not saying it’s only House members,” Lacson said in Filipino. “It’s possible that some senators have inserted funding for such projects and even profited from the 25 percent share typically given to the ‘funder’ or proponent.”

Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal
Pressed further on whether senators might be tied to these fraudulent schemes, the senator replied, “There may be senators and House members who are connected to anomalous flood control projects.”
Lacson, a long-time advocate for budget transparency, refrained from naming specific individuals, stressing the importance of solid evidence. “It’s not right to name names without proof,” he said. “In my case, I only make findings public once they are backed by factual and verifiable information.”
- Israeli army: Gaza City now 'a dangerous combat zone'
- Cyclone's trough, habagat will bring cloudy skies, rain showers over PH
- De Lima bucks Lacson's budget 'experiment
- Thailand's ex-PM Thaksin acquitted in royal insult case
- More funding sought for sports commission
- Globe: Mobile data helps drive national progress
- New Zealand to allow some wealthy foreign investors onto property market
- Palace hits Discayas over ‘misinformation’ on PH film center project
- Comelec probes 15 govt contractors over 2022 election donations
- Napoles gets 55 years for another ‘pork’ case